{
 "version": "2026-10-20",
 "license": "Dimension sheets: CC BY 4.0. Standard and published-size files: CC BY 4.0. Xem Studio's own designs (files_license = Xem Studio Design License): free to use and sell things from, not to redistribute as files — https://xemstudio.com/license/. Other publishers' files: their own license, linked beside them.",
 "slug": "propeller-slip-efficiency",
 "name": "Propeller slip and efficiency",
 "kind": "standard",
 "category": "Aircraft design",
 "group": "Propellers",
 "year": null,
 "question": "What is propeller slip?",
 "tags": [
  "vehicle design",
  "propellers",
  "rc design",
  "aerodynamics"
 ],
 "aliases": [
  "propeller slip",
  "prop slip calculator",
  "propeller efficiency",
  "effective pitch",
  "geometric pitch vs effective pitch",
  "pitch speed slip",
  "prop efficiency percent",
  "apc performance data"
 ],
 "overall_mm": {
  "length": null,
  "width": null,
  "height": null
 },
 "official_cad": false,
 "xem_status": "free-files",
 "les": false,
 "free_files": 1,
 "url": "https://xemstudio.com/objects/propeller-slip-efficiency/",
 "sheet_txt": "https://xemstudio.com/objects/propeller-slip-efficiency/sheet.txt",
 "sheet": {
  "basis": "Design rules and figures from the cited sources; example geometry by Xem Studio",
  "overall_mm": {
   "length": null,
   "width": null,
   "height": null
  },
  "notes": [
   "Geometric pitch is how far a prop should advance per revolution with no slip; effective pitch is how far it actually advances. Slip is the difference (FAA Powerplant Handbook).",
   "Efficiency, thrust horsepower over brake horsepower, ranges from 50% to 87% depending on slip (FAA). APC publishes performance data from vortex-theory simulations by rpm and airspeed for comparing props (Model Aviation, APC Q&A).",
   "The file is a reference example built by Xem Studio from the numbers above. Sizes the sources do not fix are illustrative; scale the example to your own vehicle."
  ],
  "table": {
   "columns": [
    "parameter",
    "value or range",
    "source"
   ],
   "rows": [
    [
     "Slip",
     "geometric pitch - effective pitch",
     "FAA Powerplant Handbook"
    ],
    [
     "Efficiency range",
     "50-87%",
     "FAA Powerplant Handbook"
    ],
    [
     "APC data basis",
     "vortex theory, by rpm and airspeed",
     "Model Aviation (APC)"
    ]
   ]
  }
 },
 "sheet_text": "Propeller slip and efficiency — dimension sheet\nSource: Xem Studio, https://xemstudio.com/objects/propeller-slip-efficiency/  (sheet CC BY 4.0; files Xem Studio Design License, https://xemstudio.com/license/)\nBasis: Design rules and figures from the cited sources; example geometry by Xem Studio\nCatalog version: 2026-10-20\n\nSizes: see table below\n- Geometric pitch is how far a prop should advance per revolution with no slip; effective pitch is how far it actually advances. Slip is the difference (FAA Powerplant Handbook).\n- Efficiency, thrust horsepower over brake horsepower, ranges from 50% to 87% depending on slip (FAA). APC publishes performance data from vortex-theory simulations by rpm and airspeed for comparing props (Model Aviation, APC Q&A).\n- The file is a reference example built by Xem Studio from the numbers above. Sizes the sources do not fix are illustrative; scale the example to your own vehicle.\n\nparameter  value or range  source\nSlip  geometric pitch - effective pitch  FAA Powerplant Handbook\nEfficiency range  50-87%  FAA Powerplant Handbook\nAPC data basis  vortex theory, by rpm and airspeed  Model Aviation (APC)\n\nFiles elsewhere (not hosted by Xem Studio; license as stated by the publisher):\n- FAA: Aviation Maintenance Technician Handbook - Powerplant, Ch. 7 Propellers — web — Publisher's page; dimensions are facts — https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/09_amtp_ch7.pdf\n- Model Aviation (AMA), J. Smith with APC Propellers: Common Questions with APC Propellers (Mar 2021) — web — Publisher's page; dimensions are facts — https://www.modelaviation.com/node/2115\n\nFree files (Xem Studio Design License, Xem Studio; STEP + STL, 1 parts): https://xemstudio.com/files/hardware/propeller-slip-efficiency/index.json\nAPI: https://xemstudio.com/api/geometry?object=propeller-slip-efficiency\n",
 "sources": [
  {
   "publisher": "FAA",
   "title": "Aviation Maintenance Technician Handbook - Powerplant, Ch. 7 Propellers",
   "url": "https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/09_amtp_ch7.pdf",
   "formats": [
    "web"
   ],
   "license": "Publisher's page; dimensions are facts",
   "license_verified": true,
   "hosted": false
  },
  {
   "publisher": "Model Aviation (AMA), J. Smith with APC Propellers",
   "title": "Common Questions with APC Propellers (Mar 2021)",
   "url": "https://www.modelaviation.com/node/2115",
   "formats": [
    "web"
   ],
   "license": "Publisher's page; dimensions are facts",
   "license_verified": true,
   "hosted": false
  }
 ],
 "xem": {
  "status": "free-files",
  "sheet_free": true,
  "mesh_price_usd": null,
  "step_price_usd": null,
  "tolerance_mm": null
 },
 "related": [
  "propeller-diameter-vs-pitch",
  "pitch-diameter-ratio",
  "propeller-blade-count",
  "propeller-helix-angle-blade-twist",
  "apc-propeller-rpm-limits",
  "apc-propeller-naming"
 ],
 "fits": [],
 "dimensions": "exact (nominal, no printing tolerance)",
 "dimension_rule": "All geometry on Xem Studio is exact (nominal, true size) with no printing tolerance. Where a part meets another part, the object lists its mating features (feature, exact size, what it mates with, fit class: press, slide, run, socket, clamp or designed). Apply your process's allowance to those features only; 'designed' gaps are part of the design and stay as drawn.",
 "mating": [],
 "faq": [
  {
   "q": "How efficient is a propeller?",
   "a": "Between 50% and 87% depending on slip (FAA Powerplant Handbook)."
  }
 ],
 "files_license": {
  "name": "Xem Studio Design License",
  "holder": "Xem Studio",
  "url": "https://xemstudio.com/license/",
  "note": "Xem Studio's own design: free to use, print, modify and sell things made from it; not to be republished or redistributed as files."
 },
 "offers": [
  {
   "file": "propeller-slip-efficiency-propeller",
   "formats": [
    "step",
    "stl"
   ],
   "price_usd": 0,
   "license": "Xem Studio Design License",
   "step": "https://xemstudio.com/files/hardware/propeller-slip-efficiency/propeller-slip-efficiency-propeller.step",
   "stl": "https://xemstudio.com/files/hardware/propeller-slip-efficiency/propeller-slip-efficiency-propeller.stl",
   "note": "10×6 in propeller, 2 blades: each section set at the geometric pitch angle atan(P / 2πr); chord and section illustrative"
  }
 ],
 "markdown": "https://xemstudio.com/objects/propeller-slip-efficiency/index.md"
}