Library › Aircraft design › Ground-effect design ·

Ground effect: height/chord ratio (ram / chord-dominated regime)

What height-to-chord ratio do WIG craft fly at? · Standard part · basis: Design rules and figures from the cited sources; example geometry by Xem Studio

Also called: ground effect height chord ratio, h/c ratio wig, extreme ground effect, ram effect wing, chord dominated ground effect, wig cruise height, ekranoplan flight height, ground effect lift to drag, wig l/d

Exact dimensions. True size, with no printing tolerance added.

sizes
7 in table

Notes

  • Rozhdestvensky defines extreme ground effect as clearances of 10% of the main wing chord or less, distinguishing chord-dominated ground effect (flow stagnation under the wing) from span-dominated (induced-drag reduction).
  • Moore et al. split ram effect (h/c <= 10%) from normal ground effect, and a review concludes rectangular wings are most effective within 15% of chord (Frontiers 2022 review).
  • An isolated AR 2-3 wing at about 20% chord clearance reaches L/D of roughly 35-45, but hull, pylons and tail cut that by about 65% to 12-16 for a whole craft (Rozhdestvensky, citing Kirillovykh).
  • The file is a reference example built by Xem Studio from the numbers above. Sizes the sources do not fix are illustrative; scale the example to your own vehicle.

Ground effect: height/chord ratio size chart

parametervalue or rangesource
Extreme ground effecth <= 10% chordRozhdestvensky 2006
Ram effect regimeh/c <= 10%Frontiers 2022 (Moore et al.)
Most effective (rectangular wings)within 15% chordFrontiers 2022
Isolated wing L/D, AR 2-3 at 20% c35-45Rozhdestvensky (Kirillovykh)
Whole-vehicle L/D after integration12-16 (losses: hull ~40%, pylons ~15%, tail ~5%)Rozhdestvensky
Proposed GE-zone definitionheight where lift is ~30% above free-flight valueRozhdestvensky
Reference buildspan 600, chord 300computed (AR 2)

Where the files are

Other publishers' files are linked, not hosted. "verify" = check the license at the link before commercial use.

Progress in Aerospace Sciences (K.V. Rozhdestvensky, 2006)Wing-in-ground effect vehicles (review)webPublisher's page; dimensions are facts
Frontiers in Aerospace Engineering (2022)Review of ground-effect experiments on rectangular, reverse-delta and delta wingswebPublisher's page; dimensions are facts
NASA Langley (Fink & Lastinger)Aerodynamic Characteristics of Low-Aspect-Ratio Wings in Close Proximity to the Ground, NASA TN D-926 (1961)webPublisher's page; dimensions are facts

Free files

★ Free files 1 parts. Xem Studio design: free to use, print and sell things from; not to be republished as files. Xem Studio Design License. index.json

ground-effect-height-chord-ratio-wingendplated wing: span 600, chord 300 mm, anhedral 0°, endplates 30 mm (scale to your craft)STEP · STL
Let your AI pull this. Add https://xemstudio.com/mcp to Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor or any MCP client (free, no account, one minute) and it can look up exact sizes, mating fits and free STEP/STL from every chat.
Set it up →

Plain text: sheet.txt · JSON: /api/geometry?object=ground-effect-height-chord-ratio

Ground effect: height/chord ratio (ram / chord-dominated regime), isometric render of a generated part
Render of ground-effect-height-chord-ratio-wing from the free STEP; not to scale.

Fits with

Questions

How high should a WIG model fly?

Extreme ground effect is below 10% of chord; reviews put rectangular wings' sweet spot within 15% chord (Rozhdestvensky; Frontiers).